Mock trial Reaction: Brown v. Board of Ed

Brown v. Board of Education:

From Brown's side, it’s argued that everyone is created equal by God, and separating children based on their race stops them from reaching their full potential. The “separate but equal” rule doesn’t create equality it just separates. Trying to unite the country while teaching kids they are different doesn't make sense. Why shouldn't African Americans be treated equally in society after demonstrating their equality in the military by occupying significant positions? All children may have equal access to education through school integration, which would increase resources and foster togetherness. Instead of funding individual schools, the money may be used to enhance the educational system as a whole. Better education would result in higher-paying jobs for African Americans thanks to integrated schools. Additionally, white students would gain from the opportunity to network with more people, which would boost their financial situation. Since African American schools are not truly equal, the "separate but equal" principle is in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law to all individuals. African Americans must be afforded the same opportunities as white students, and the struggle for equality will persist until this is achieved.

White people are equally impacted by the "separate but equal" norm, according to the Board of Education. African Americans should pay taxes like white people do if they want better schools. Black communities have demonstrated their ability to create thriving economies, as demonstrated by the success of Oklahoma's Black Wall Street. Violence broke out after a Black man allegedly attacked a white woman, which resulted in the demolition of Black Wall Street. Such animosity might increase if races were blended. Some contend that even though African Americans currently enjoy rights and opportunities, they continue to want more rather than make use of what they already have. The idea that racial segregation is a part of God's design is supported by the Bible. Past court cases, like the Topeka case, showed that “separate but equal” doesn’t break the law. The issue isn’t with the doctrine itself, but how it’s carried out, and that should be up to the local government. Keeping the “separate but equal” rule is the right thing to do legally.

The judge wraps up by saying that the country is moving toward desegregation, and African Americans are slowly gaining equal rights. Many outdated customs, not just in schools but also in transportation, entertainment, and the military, are being left behind. How can we expect African Americans to risk their lives for the country and still treat them as second-class citizens? It’s also more efficient to fund one good school system instead of two. In integrated communities, crime rates are lower, people make more money, and living is more affordable for both Black and white people. If both separate school systems were equal, then the “separate but equal” rule could work, but that’s not the case. The state of Kansas disagrees with the claim that their schools are

unequal, arguing that Black communities can’t pay enough taxes for better facilities

Nonetheless, it has been demonstrated that Black communities are not required to remain in low-income circumstances. The Tulsa race riot occurred due to the achievements of Black individuals, and integration might result in even greater success. Change should occur gradually, and the judge is questioned about his intention to disturb God’s order. All previous cases in Kansas were dismissed, and the state triumphed in everyone. This instance is not unlike others. Ultimately, the court concludes that Brown prevails in the case.